• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Implementing Advanced Site Characterization Tools

Home
About ITRC
Navigating this Website
1 Introduction
1 Introduction Overview
1.1 Purpose and Scope
1.2 Technologies
1.3 How to Use this Document
2 ASCT Implementation
2 ASCT Implementation Overview
2.1 Tool Selection
2.2 Tool Application
3 Direct Sensing
3 Direct Sensing Overview
3.1 How to Select and Apply Direct Sensing Tools Using this Document
3.2 Membrane Interface Probe
3.3 Optical Image Profiler
3.4 Laser-Induced Fluorescence
3.5 Cone Penetrometer Testing
3.6 Hydraulic and Groundwater Profiling Tools
3.7 Electrical Conductivity (EC) Probe
3.8 Flexible Liners
4 Borehole Geophysics
4 Borehole Geophysics Overview
4.1 How to Select and Apply Borehole Geophysical Tools Using this Document
4.2 Fluid Temperature
4.3 Fluid Resistivity
4.4 Mechanical Caliper
4.5 Optical Televiewer
4.6 Acoustic Televiewer
4.7 Natural Gamma Logging
4.8 Borehole Flow Meters
4.9 Advanced Borehole Logging Tools
5 Surface Geophysics
5 Surface Geophysics Overview
5.1 How to Select and Apply Surface Geophysical Tools Using this Document
5.2 Electrical Resistivity Imaging
5.3 Ground Penetrating Radar
5.4 Seismic Methods
5.5 Electromagnetic Surveys
6 Remote Sensing
6 Remote Sensing Overview
6.1 How to Select and Apply Remote Sensing Tools Using this Document
6.2 Drones
6.3 Visible Spectrum Camera
6.4 Camera Features
6.5 Photogrammetry
6.6 Sample Collection and Monitoring using Drones
6.7 Cost Considerations
6.8 Case Studies
7 Stakeholder and Tribal Perspectives
8 Regulatory Perspective
8 Regulatory Perspective Overview
8.1 Challenges and Solutions
9 Case Studies
9 Case Studies Overview
9.1 MIP Boring Data Allow On-Site Decisions to Fill Data Gaps and Reduce Uncertainty during Triad Approach Evaluation at Five South Dakota Sites
9.2 MIP Allows Real-Time Identification and Delineation of DNAPL Plume at a Former Naval Air Station in California
9.3 OIP-Green Probe Delineates Extent of Coal Tar NAPL at a Former Gas Manufacturing Plant in Kansas
9.4 LIF Survey with UOVOST® Provides More Accurate Representation of LNAPL Plume at a Former Bulk Petroleum Storage Facility in New Hampshire
9.5 UVOST Differentiates LNAPL Types to Allocate Financial Liabilities at a Retail Petroleum Facility in Tennessee
9.6 TarGOST Determines DNAPL Extent and HPT Confirms Site Lithology at a Former Creosote Facility in Louisiana
9.7 CPT Borings and Hydropunch Sampler Optimize Site Characterization at an Aviation Industrial Complex in California
9.8 Waterloo APS, CPT, and LIF Data Update CSM and Help Optimize Selected Remedy at a Former Refinery in Oklahoma
9.9 Conceptual Site Model Development Using Borehole Geophysics at the Savage Municipal Water Supply Superfund Site in New Hampshire
9.10 ERI Provides Data to Improve Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport Models at Hanford 300 Facility in Washington
9.11 Surface and Borehole Geophysical Technologies Provide Data to Pinpoint and Characterize Karst Features at a Former Retail Petroleum Facility in Kentucky
9.12 GPR Data Show Location of Buried Debris and Piping Associated with a Former Gas Holder in Minnesota
9.13 Resistivity, Seismic Exploration, and GPR Provide Data to Evaluate Clay Reserves at a Commercially Mined Pit
9.14 Seismic Refraction, Electric Resistivity, and Multichannel Analysis of Seismic Waves Provide Data to Locate Monitoring Well Locations in a Mixed-Use Area in Northern Virginia
9.15 Surface Geophysical Methods Provide Data to Identify Prospective Utility Waste Landfill Sites in Karst Terrain in Missouri
9.16 Airborne Time-Domain Electromagnetic Method Maps Sand Distribution along the Illinois Lake Michigan Shore
9.17 Drone Technology Expedites and Streamlines Site Characterization at a Former Golf Course in Missouri
9.18 High-Resolution and Thermal Aerial Images Identify Mine Openings at an Abandoned Colorado Mine
9.19 RPAS Collects Water Samples to Avoid Safety Concerns at Montana Tunnels Mine
Additional Information
Appendix A. Tool Tables and Checklists
Glossary
References
Acronyms
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback

 

Click for Selection Tool Click for Summary Tables Click for Tool Descriptions Click for Case Studies Click for Checklists Click for Training Videos Click for Home

2 ASCT Implementation

The implementation of ASCTs involves selecting the appropriate tool, applying the tool in an appropriate location, and performing basic data interpretation. Considerations for use of an ASCT may include but are not limited to:

  • Does it fill data gaps and meet data quality needs?
  • Is it technically feasible? (for example, are there constraints on use of the ASCT such as limitations due to area and depth of coverage or availability of the tool)
  • Will it be approved by the regulator? (for example, use may vary by purpose such as screening versus investigation)
  • Are trained and qualified contractors available within the geographic area?
  • Is it sensitive to the contaminant of concern?
  • Does it provide additional value or potential value to the investigation?
  • Does it support existing data for multiple lines of evidence?
  • What is the data collection objective? (for example, screening, delineation, pilot testing, monitoring, remediation)
  • What is the form of data output? (for example, real-time data, electronic usability)
  • Is it a dynamic or static tool? (for example, is it supplemental to an existing investigation?)
  • What is the urgency? (for example, is it a public or ecological risk? Is the affected public demanding action?)
  • How much time will it take to complete?
  • Will it help evaluate site concerns and achieve end goals?

2.1 Tool Selection

Selection and proper use of any investigative tool is fundamental to a successful project and is the responsibility of the project team. The use of an ASCT should be considered at the onset of an investigation. Final selection of appropriate investigation tools and techniques occurs once a CSM is developed, data gaps are identified, and data collection planning is complete.

2.1.1 Data Needs

Often, several different tools can be used to meet a specific data collection objective. In addition, many ASCTs provide qualitative rather than quantitative data which is important to consider. Selecting the optimum tool or combination of tools relies on several factors, including:

  • ability of the tool to effectively provide data given site conditions
  • availability and cost of the tool
  • reliability of the tool
  • familiarity with the tool
  • expertise required to use the tool
  • expertise required to interpret data from the tool
  • acceptability of data generated to stakeholders

2.1.2 Cost and Value Considerations

ASCTs are generally perceived as expensive to use; however, the amount, precision, and accuracy of data generated using ASCTs are often greater than traditional sampling techniques (for example, soil borings, monitoring wells) and can result in cost savings over the life of the project. The value of an approach is not always monetary, but may also be measured based on time, convenience, social impact, or other qualitative impacts. During the tool selection process, it is important to consider the monetary costs, the value added by the investigation, and whether the technology is appropriate for the site.

2.1.3 Cost Benefit Comparison of Traditional Tools vs. ASCTs

A cost-benefit analysis using the following approach allows the merits of advanced and traditional tools at a particular site to be evaluated:

  • Outline all potential costs that will be incurred using a particular tool or approach.
  • Compare to the total expected benefit to determine whether the proposed action is advisable. (Note: The overall benefit associated with a proposed action should outweigh the incurred costs.)
  • Compare to alternatives for which all potential costs are also outlined.
  • Record all anticipated benefits associated with the potential action.
  • Weigh all identified costs relative to the expected benefits to determine whether the positive benefits outweigh the negative costs.

2.2 Tool Application

Advanced site characterization tools (ASCTs) can be used to identify locations and depths where quantitative data should be collected, to support the characterization of subsurface geology and hydrogeology, and to improve or complete a CSM. Applying ASCTs is particularly effective:

  • at sites where conventional tools are incapable of providing data of sufficient density or quality
  • in complex hydrogeological conditions (for example, fractured bedrock, karst, intricate alluvial channel systems)
  • at sites where existing remedial strategies have not been effective or where remedial strategy effectiveness is sensitive to the precise distribution of a contaminant in the subsurface
  • during emergency response situations when timely decision making is required

image_pdfPrint this page/section
Click here to download the entire document.



ASCT-1

web document
glossaryASCT-1
Glossary
referencesASCT-1
References
acronymsASCT-1
Acronyms

ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.